Mar 01

AIB Site Redesign

by in Web Design

AIB has redone their site a small bit making the navigation that bit simpler.
What’s really nice is that they’ve made the online banking links really prominent on the top left of the navigation bar.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

12 Responses to “AIB Site Redesign”

  1. From Robert Synnott:

    I see banking online itself remains insane, though.

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 11:15 am #
  2. From Stewart Curry:

    I like it – it’s a big improvement on what was there. It looks well put toether under the bonnet too.

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 11:38 am #
  3. From Lar Veale:

    Thanks for the heads up, Michele. I’m beavering away writing a case study on the benefits of designing with web standards for the IIA blog and I’m going to use the before and after as an example.

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 1:00 pm #
  4. From michele:

    Lar
    Is it standards based now?
    I haven’t had the energy to check :)
    Michele

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 1:35 pm #
  5. From Keith Gaughan:

    Only appears to be the frontpage they improved, their URLs still suck, and as Robert noted, their online banking app also still sucks.

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 1:48 pm #
  6. From michele:

    Keith
    It works fine for me, though the overseas EFT cutoff thing strikes me as more than a little demented
    Michele

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 1:50 pm #
  7. From Stewart Curry:

    HTML – validates XHTML 1.0 Transitional
    CSS – no errors
    A few accessibility errors, but nothing that seems too serious.
    I ran it through http://www.totalvalidator.com/ which is a great little plugin for Flock/Firefox – even does browser sreengrabs

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 2:03 pm #
  8. From Lar Veale:

    Michele,
    seems to be standards based, though probably a little bit of DIV-itis going on (too many DIVs)
    Michele, can you tell me, if there are any statistics, on how much “bandwidth” costs for a commercial organisation.
    What I’m getting at is if I saved 20 GB of bandwidth per page, per year, how would that translate into brass tacks?
    lar

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 2:07 pm #
  9. From michele:

    Lar
    It depends on how much they are buying ie. if you are buying 200 megabits you pay a lot less per meg than someone buying 5 megabits.
    In the case of a bank they’re probably using leased lines or maybe fibre (I’ve no idea where their equipment is, so I’m just making a wild guess).
    Apart from a cost saving they would see a performance saving if they are running X number of servers / services on a leased line…
    Michele

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 2:24 pm #
  10. From Cormac:

    It reminds me of the H365 website a bit.
    I like it, very nice.

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 2:30 pm #
  11. From Ken:

    A big improvement. It’ll be nice when the whole site is a little more consistent though. At the moment it seems to be all over the place.

    Posted on March 1, 2007 at 8:23 pm #
  12. From michele:

    Ken
    Yeah – it’s all over the place at the moment. If you go poking around you can find the oddest pages that seem to be leftovers or maybe the beginnings of things…
    Keith – The URL redirects are more than a little demented, but that seems to be “fashionable” with banks :) (or maybe I’ve just had bad luck!)
    Michele

    Posted on March 2, 2007 at 1:25 am #