The shortlist for this year's Golden Spiders was announced last Friday.
As usual people are none too pleased with the list and I'd be a hypocrite not to agree with them.
Why so much displeasure?
Well you could look at the entry criteria......
Even though the awards are sponsored by large companies you still have to pay to nominate a site. Why do I get the feeling that a lot of quality sites don't even get entered????
OR
you could look at the shortlist itself.... (which a lot of people have been doing)
Either way the merit of the awards is not appreciated in many industry circles.
Richard and Peter both commented on how most of the shortlisted sites do not pass the W3C validation test (which tests to see if a website's code is compliant with industry standards). The W3C validator does not care which version of (X)HTML a site is written in, as long as the site's code complies to the chosen standard.
Richard has since taken his gripes to the next level by doing some further testing of the shortlist. The results make for interesting reading.
Of course previous winners' sites aren't even viewable unless you use Internet Explorer....
Categories:
6 Comments
Rate This Blog
Find Me Elsewhere
Categories
- Cinema (111)
- Daily Links (57)
- Domains & Hosting (37)
- General (109)
- Harry Potter (17)
- Linguistics (29)
- Podcasting (21)
- Techie :: Techno :: (658)
- Thoughts :: Pensieri :: (269)
- Work :: Lavoro :: (105)
- accessibility (19)
- adsense (2)
- adwords (15)
- amazon (12)
- apache (5)
- apple (54)
- audio (2)
- barcamp (6)
- blacknight (66)
- blogging (70)
- books (16)
- cool (101)
- copyright (5)
- data retention (2)
- design (22)
- ebay (14)
- ecommerce (59)
- events (26)
- gaming (6)
- google (32)
- humour (107)
- iedr (12)
- iia (29)
- interviews (3)
- jaiku (4)
- linksys (4)
- marketing (47)
- microsoft (19)
- movabletype (14)
- paypal (3)
- philately (5)
- phones (13)
- photography (28)
- politics (1)
- rant (36)
- ripe (6)
- security (10)
- seo (28)
- skycon (4)
- technoratifeedback (3)
- travel (31)
- tv (5)
- twitter (21)
- weird (11)
- wordpress (7)
- yahoo (2)
Monthly Archives
- June 2010 (3)
- May 2010 (23)
- April 2010 (35)
- March 2010 (24)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (11)
- December 2009 (10)
- November 2009 (11)
- October 2009 (10)
- September 2009 (11)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (7)
- June 2009 (12)
- May 2009 (19)
- April 2009 (17)
- March 2009 (13)
- February 2009 (19)
- January 2009 (15)
- December 2008 (28)
- November 2008 (24)
- October 2008 (10)
- September 2008 (14)
- August 2008 (29)
- July 2008 (24)
- June 2008 (19)
- May 2008 (36)
- April 2008 (43)
- March 2008 (41)
- February 2008 (51)
- January 2008 (35)
- December 2007 (22)
- November 2007 (21)
- October 2007 (42)
- September 2007 (71)
- August 2007 (61)
- July 2007 (39)
- June 2007 (37)
- May 2007 (41)
- April 2007 (39)
- March 2007 (63)
- February 2007 (47)
- January 2007 (82)
- December 2006 (25)
- November 2006 (34)
- October 2006 (28)
- September 2006 (36)
- August 2006 (40)
- July 2006 (31)
- June 2006 (45)
- May 2006 (47)
- April 2006 (40)
- March 2006 (39)
- February 2006 (54)
- January 2006 (63)
- December 2005 (38)
- November 2005 (61)
- October 2005 (68)
- September 2005 (46)
- August 2005 (54)
- July 2005 (85)
- June 2005 (25)
- May 2005 (20)
- April 2005 (18)
- March 2005 (19)
- February 2005 (13)
- January 2005 (15)
- December 2004 (9)
- November 2004 (14)
- October 2004 (13)
- September 2004 (11)
- August 2004 (23)
- July 2004 (7)
- June 2004 (1)
- May 2004 (1)
- April 2004 (2)
- March 2004 (5)
- February 2004 (2)
- January 2004 (10)
- December 2003 (8)
- November 2003 (4)
OpenID accepted here
Learn more about OpenID
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Michele Neylon published on November 5, 2006 11:05 AM.
IIA NetVisionary 2006 Shortlist Announced was the previous entry in this blog.
Harry Potter DVD Goodness is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Recent Activity
Today
- Michele posted Clever New Cadbury's Flake TV Spot
- Michele tweeted, "@dereklawless well a lot of iPhone / Android users think that apps are the answer to everything whereas a functional mobile site would be"
- Michele tweeted, "@UtterDomain :) I'm just glad they refunded me so quickly"
- Michele tweeted, "Arrington being put in his place: http://bit.ly/bIQdYN"
- Michele tweeted, "RT @struan99: Roaming cap is lawful, rules ECJ http://bit.ly/b4vV5e"
- Michele tweeted, "@jintlaw linkage?"
- Michele tweeted, "RT @markwebster: For anyone who didn't buy Computers in Business magazine on Sunday, here it is online http://goo.gl/4jvK (PDF)"
- Michele tweeted, "@markwebster you could have warned that it was a PDF!"
- Michele tweeted, "RT @DomainIncite: DI: Red Bull wins court case but loses UDRP http://bit.ly/a7QrSH"
- Michele tweeted, "@andrewbarnes666 well if you ever moonlight *cough*"
An awards scheme not judged on merit or actual criteria? No shortage of those to be fair ;)
In fairness, there are criteria set out by the Golden Spider Awards for each category. It's just that the judges are biased and/or incompetent. Or maybe they just arbitrarily choose the winners, who knows. At any rate, it's a farce.
'At any rate, it’s a farce. '
Arent all awards schemes, at some level :)
"Arent all awards schemes, at some level"
I wouldn't have said so, necessarily. The 'farce' that is the Golden Spiders has afforded some very dodgy companies to profit greatly from client ignorance.
Ah well done Michele. Nice to see you name up there.
It's so hard to decide where to comment - am I missing something here or where is the response from the Golden Spiders about this whole issue?
Well, two issues really - 1) why doesn't quailty of design (subjective, granted, but just LOOK at some of the sites) & construction (non-subjective) appear to be given the importance it should be, as expressed in the entry criteria, and 2) why are so many sponsors nominated for awards? Surely that can't result in impartial desicisons?
ANyway, keep fighting the good fight...