Typo squatting can be quite a lucrative business. Lucrative that is until you lose your domains via a WIPO ruling.
One squatter had three typos of amazon.com:
amazoh.com, qmqzon.com and smszon.com
As is often the case with such practices the registrant had already been subject to a number of previous WIPO hearings...
Don't they ever learn?
Of course the question I should be asking is whether it really is worth the hassle or not..
Two of the three Amazon domains have already been redirected to Amazon.com, while the 3rd is pointing to a fairly standard monetisation service.
If it's really worth the hassle then maybe more people should be taking advantage of the opportunities...
Categories:
2 Comments
Rate This Blog
Find Me Elsewhere
Categories
- Cinema (111)
- Daily Links (57)
- Domains & Hosting (37)
- General (109)
- Harry Potter (17)
- Linguistics (29)
- Podcasting (21)
- Techie :: Techno :: (658)
- Thoughts :: Pensieri :: (269)
- Work :: Lavoro :: (105)
- accessibility (19)
- adsense (2)
- adwords (15)
- amazon (12)
- apache (5)
- apple (54)
- audio (2)
- barcamp (6)
- blacknight (66)
- blogging (70)
- books (16)
- cool (101)
- copyright (5)
- data retention (2)
- design (22)
- ebay (14)
- ecommerce (59)
- events (26)
- gaming (6)
- google (32)
- humour (107)
- iedr (12)
- iia (29)
- interviews (3)
- jaiku (4)
- linksys (4)
- marketing (47)
- microsoft (19)
- movabletype (14)
- paypal (3)
- philately (5)
- phones (13)
- photography (28)
- politics (1)
- rant (36)
- ripe (6)
- security (10)
- seo (28)
- skycon (4)
- technoratifeedback (3)
- travel (31)
- tv (5)
- twitter (21)
- weird (11)
- wordpress (7)
- yahoo (2)
Monthly Archives
- June 2010 (3)
- May 2010 (23)
- April 2010 (35)
- March 2010 (24)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (11)
- December 2009 (10)
- November 2009 (11)
- October 2009 (10)
- September 2009 (11)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (7)
- June 2009 (12)
- May 2009 (19)
- April 2009 (17)
- March 2009 (13)
- February 2009 (19)
- January 2009 (15)
- December 2008 (28)
- November 2008 (24)
- October 2008 (10)
- September 2008 (14)
- August 2008 (29)
- July 2008 (24)
- June 2008 (19)
- May 2008 (36)
- April 2008 (43)
- March 2008 (41)
- February 2008 (51)
- January 2008 (35)
- December 2007 (22)
- November 2007 (21)
- October 2007 (42)
- September 2007 (71)
- August 2007 (61)
- July 2007 (39)
- June 2007 (37)
- May 2007 (41)
- April 2007 (39)
- March 2007 (63)
- February 2007 (47)
- January 2007 (82)
- December 2006 (25)
- November 2006 (34)
- October 2006 (28)
- September 2006 (36)
- August 2006 (40)
- July 2006 (31)
- June 2006 (45)
- May 2006 (47)
- April 2006 (40)
- March 2006 (39)
- February 2006 (54)
- January 2006 (63)
- December 2005 (38)
- November 2005 (61)
- October 2005 (68)
- September 2005 (46)
- August 2005 (54)
- July 2005 (85)
- June 2005 (25)
- May 2005 (20)
- April 2005 (18)
- March 2005 (19)
- February 2005 (13)
- January 2005 (15)
- December 2004 (9)
- November 2004 (14)
- October 2004 (13)
- September 2004 (11)
- August 2004 (23)
- July 2004 (7)
- June 2004 (1)
- May 2004 (1)
- April 2004 (2)
- March 2004 (5)
- February 2004 (2)
- January 2004 (10)
- December 2003 (8)
- November 2003 (4)
OpenID accepted here
Learn more about OpenID
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Michele Neylon published on July 11, 2006 9:58 AM.
How Not To Do PR was the previous entry in this blog.
Darwin Award Candidate - Dublin Zoo Tiger Person is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Recent Activity
Today
- Michele tweeted, "@damienmulley linkage?"
- Michele posted Clever New Cadbury's Flake TV Spot
- Michele tweeted, "@dereklawless well a lot of iPhone / Android users think that apps are the answer to everything whereas a functional mobile site would be"
- Michele tweeted, "@UtterDomain :) I'm just glad they refunded me so quickly"
- Michele tweeted, "Arrington being put in his place: http://bit.ly/bIQdYN"
- Michele tweeted, "RT @struan99: Roaming cap is lawful, rules ECJ http://bit.ly/b4vV5e"
- Michele tweeted, "@jintlaw linkage?"
- Michele tweeted, "RT @markwebster: For anyone who didn't buy Computers in Business magazine on Sunday, here it is online http://goo.gl/4jvK (PDF)"
- Michele tweeted, "@markwebster you could have warned that it was a PDF!"
- Michele tweeted, "RT @DomainIncite: DI: Red Bull wins court case but loses UDRP http://bit.ly/a7QrSH"
I just need advice, im very new at the domain business industry, i bought a domain to be able to resell it,(i havent posted or done anything with its name or web site) like i said im new at this, but now i have this guy saying that hes going to take legal actions against me beause he has the copyrights( i checked yesterday and he does, since 2004) my question is can i at least sell it to him or my only choice is just to give it to him and avoid problems. He says i have until today to contact him.
thank you
Harold
I'm not a legal expert, but if you sell them the domain at a lower price than the cost of them going to UDRP then you may be "okay", however you might be better advised to seek legal advice
Michele